NSW Premier Chris Minns was also a victim of Zhu Minshen - personal experience should motivate Minns to order investigation into Mark Speakman and underlings' business with Zhu Minshen

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 

                                                                                        

                        NSW Premier Chris Minns

The Daily Telegraph reported on 10 September 2016: 

Kogarah MP Chris Minns said his electorate office received a $2000 cheque from Minshen Zhu’s Top Education group in the lead up to the state election last year.

But he said the cheque was not accompanied by one of Labor’s “prohibited donor declaration forms”, which the party made every sponsor sign to state that they were a legal political donor.

Mr Minns said after the form did arrive several months later his staff sought further advice from the Labor Party’s Sussex St head office on Dr Zhu but it never came.

“In an abundance of caution, we made a decision not to cash the cheque because we didn’t have the appropriate paperwork,” Mr Minns told The Saturday Telegraph last night.

Minns is now Premier NSW, and his personal experience ought to motivate his government and he to address the problem of Zhu Minshen's Sydney City School Of Law, which lives on due to the re- accreditation granted by former AG and current  Leader Of The Opposition, Mark Speakman/

 TO BE READ WITH 

Liberal donor Zhu Minshen's law school open for enrolment for the first time in 4 years-further mystery surrounds AG Mark Speakman's approval, concerns about questionable academic standards remain

March 17, 2023

 

Thursday, March 16, 2023

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 

Liberal donor Zhu Minshen (since deceased) law school has begun enrolling new students for the first  time in 4 years. Zhu's Top Education Group, now trading as IMC, has not provided any explanation for the suspension of enrolments since 2019, just after its LLB course was reaccreditated by the NSW Legal Profession Admission Board. The LPAB is part of the NSW Department Of Justice which ultimately reports to the NSW Attorney General Mark Speakman SC. 

The license to award law degrees, issued has remained in place despite the suspension of enrolments. It is likely that suspension of the license would have caused an even more drastic fall in Top's share price. 

This sudden unexplained resumption in enrolments adds to the  mystery that surrounds AG Mark Speakman's  anomalous approval granted Zhu Minshen. Speakman has remained silent. His NSW LPAB and he have not addressed the matter of Zhu's questionable academic standards. 

To Be Read With 

Wednesday, April 10, 2019

NSW Libs received donations of $44,275 from TOP Education Group just before after TOP was granted the "first & only" license issued a private company to award law degrees: AG Speakman and his LPAB refuse to disclose all details in the LPAB Annual Reports

by Ganesh Sahathevan

Mark Speakman

As First Law Officer of the state, Mark oversees 
the administration of almost 200 Acts of Parliament, 
the most of any minister in the NSW Government. 

The Legal Profession Admission Board is a  statutory body chaired by the Chief Justice of New South Wales.Its annual report is tabled in the NSW Parliament by the Attorney General NSW , currently Mark Speakman SC,for approval.

The LPAB's duties include granting licenses for the award of  Bachelor of Laws (LLB) degrees to interested parties ,which until recently were all public universities. In 2015 the LPAB issued a license to grant LLBs to TOP Education Group Ltd, which proudly proclaims the fact that it is the "first and only" private company to have been granted such a license. 

The AG NSW is also the Liberal Member for Cronulla and he,as well as the LPAB , have been queried about the following issues discovered in the LPAB's 2015 Annual Report which relate to the TOP Group application. 

The  LPAB states in its 2015 Annual Report:

In addition, the LPAB received an application for accreditation of a new law degree to be offered by a non-university provider, TOP Education Institute (LLB).
The LPAB considered the advice of its Accreditation Sub-Committee and Legal Qualifications Committee, and also consulted with other admitting authorities through the Law Admissions Consultative Committee (LACC),  before deciding to accredit the new degree with effect from 1 January 2015.
http://www.lpab.justice.nsw.gov.au/Documents/Annual%20Report%202014-15.


With regards the above the LPAB and the  AG have  been asked why in considering the TOP application they  appear not to have considered   TOP  Group's CEO and controlling shareholder Minshen Zhu's  business failures which were a matter of public record in 2015 ,and collated in its 2018 Prospectus issued in connection with the Initial Public Offering (IPO) of its stock and listing on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. Zhu's business failures are listed on page 160 and 167 of the IPO Prospectus. They are failures in small businesses which in turn raise questions about his capacity to fund a much larger venture like TOP.

The LPAB and AG were  also queried about the exclusion from the 2015 Annual Report of material that had been disclosed in the 2012 Annual Report where it is stated  that LPAB member  Dr Gordon Elkington was assigned to TEQSA to assist with the TOP  application for the relevant licenses from TEQSA. 

The exclusion from the 2015 annual report of the information disclosed in the 2012 annual report gives the impression that the LPAB's assessment of the TOP application in 2015 was a dealing with a party with which it had no prior relationship, when in fact it had.

All of the above would be of  concern to both students and investors given the dramatic collapse in TOP's share price, The AG and the LPAB have confirmed in writing that they are not interested in answering any of the questions above.

It has since been discovered that in the 4 months or so prior to the LPAB granting TOP  the license to issue law degrees, TOP made donations worth AUD 44 275 to the Liberal Party NSW Branch.

While  Mr Speakman is AG and the most senior law officer in the state, he is first and foremost a politician.He would not be AG had he not been elected.

It was to his party that the above donations have been made,and his refusal to answer the questions above does raise the perception that something is not quite right. 

His Department Of Justice has in the past shown that the Minister ,his Department Of Justice,and the LPAB can and do work together in the interest of their Minister and vice versa.This has included a recent non-disclosure of complaints against the LPAB and the College Of Law in the 2018 Annual Report.

Hence it is not unreasonable to expect that together they  provide answers to these issues which are of public interest,and which concern their conduct as public servants.

END