George Pell 's prison telephone interview suggests highest levels of Vic Police feared a High Court appeal well before Vic Sup Crt CJ Anne Ferguson even heard Pell's appeal -Entry in Pell's prison journal raises questions that former Vic Police chief Graham Ashton and Police Minister Lisa Neville must answer

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 

                                                              

                              Graham Ashton, Lisa Neville


George Cardinal Pell-Prison Journal Volume 1 , The Cardinal Makes His Appeal  includes this entry for 4 April 2019: 

I then had a strange interview over the phone with a female member of the Placement Assessments Unit who asked two questions of me.

This was organized by a quiet courteous man who remained with me after calling up my questioner.

" Did I know the choirboys who had been molested in the cathedral?"

" Did I intend to lodge an appeal?", I was then asked, as they had no record of this. This was surprising as the appeal was lodged before my sentencing and I already have the date for the  appeal hearing on June 5-6.

The appeal was heard on June 5 and 6 2019, and a three judge panel led by Chief Justice Anne Ferguson handed down their decision rejecting the appeal on 21 August 2019. 


The Placement Assessments Unit is part of Corrections Victoria  It is  managed by the Sentence Management Branch of Corrections Victoria.  Its duty is to manage prisoner reception and management, and it has nothing whatsoever to do with the judicial system. The Minister in charge at the relevant time was Lisa Neville, Minister for Police.

The question " did I know the choirboys who had been molested in the cathedral" should not concern Corrections Victoria but would have concerned Victoria Police prosecutors who brought the case against Pell contrary to advice from the DPP Victoria. The Chief Of Police who oversaw the Pell investigation, and who was in office when the above incident occurred was Graham Leonard Ashton.

 The officer who questioned Pell  about his knowledge of the choirboys  is not likely to have formulated and initiated that question on her own. These are the questions that a lawyer or interrogator might ask to entrap a suspect, but in this case the suspect had already been convicted.

Ashton and Neville have both retired, but they must now provide answers to what appears to be a clumsy attempt at entrapment, after Pell had been convicted, and which could have only been initiated at the highest levels of Victoria Police. 

The second question seems contrived for the matter of Pell's appeal to the Supreme Court NSW was well publicised. 
It does therefore  seem likely  that Pell's interrogator's questions were intended to  frustrate any appeal by some form of threat with what could have been put forth as fresh evidence. Graham Ashton remained defiant to the end that he had no issue with how police had handled the case before charging Pell. There would therefore have been no reason to be concerned about Pell's Victorian Supreme Court appeal. It does seem however that Victoria Police were concerned about the prospect of a High COurt appeal, even before the Supreme Court appeal had been heard.



END 





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ben Robert-Smith : How was Justice Anthony Besanko of the Federal Court able to find that the crime of murder has a civil twin, which can be determined on a balance of probabilities

Image
 by Ganesh Sahathevam                                                                                                                  The Hon Justice Anthony Besanko Media reports about the Ben Robert-Smith defamation matter  have at least given the impression, if not asserted,  that Justice Anthony Besanko of the Federal Court found  that Robert-Smith had committed murder. Most if not all reports have been at pains to stress that the finding was based on a balance of probabilities, and not beyond a reasonable doubt, for the matter was a civil and not criminal matter.  However,  reading his summary one can immediately see that Justice Besanko  found not that Roberts-Smith had committed murder but that the " respondents had, (on  a balance of probabilities) established the substantial truth"  that  Roberts-Smith had committed murder.  However, murder is a  crime and a finding of murder in a criminal court (which is the court in which crimes like murder can be determined!) inv
Read more

Who authorised former NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller to say anything about the Berejiklian era quarantine fee and why? Fuller's notice confirms suspicion that NSW Berejiklian government had no basis to impose the quarantine fee, nor quarantine persons who were COVID negative 

Image
 by Ganesh Sahathevan      Premier Gladys Berejiklian with NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller and Brigadier Mick             Garraway Who authorised former  NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller  to say anything about the  Berejiklian era  quarantine fee and why? Fuller's issuance of his  COVID  quarantine notice, and subsequent silence, would seem to confirm suspicions raised on this blog that NSW's Berejiklian government had no basis to impose its quarantine fee. Fuller's conduct also adds to suspicion that the Berejiklian government did not have the authority, even under its COVID emergency powers, to quarantine persons who were COVID negative. International arrivals had to test negative for COVID before boarding their flights to Sydney, and tests had to be administered within 72 hours of departure. Quarantine on arrival of those who exhibited no COVID symptoms was quite likely unnecessary. It did, of course help bolster Gladys Berejiklian's approval ratings. TO BE RE
Read more

Revenue NSW COVID Quarantine Fee payment demand notices suggest that Police Commissioner Mick Fuller breached the law with his demand for quarantine fees

Image
 By Ganesh Sahathevan  Anyone who has received a Revenue NSW Quarantine Fee demand for payment notice  will be familiar with these words that are contained in the notice: What is the quarantine service fee? A mandatory quarantine service fee applies to all travellers arriving in New South Wales (NSW) who are required to quarantine as part of the public health order. Mandatory quarantine is needed to stop the spread. of COVID-19 in NSW The qurantine fee has been charged pursuant to Section 70 of  the NSW Health Act. However, as previously reported, that section does not permit any imposition of mandatory fees.  However, in apparent defiance of Section 70 of the Health Act, Fuller issued a notice   in which he said  that Revenue NSW " will be charging a mandatory quarantine fee". TOE BE READ WITH  Former NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller said in his notice that Revenue NSW " will be charging a mandatory quarantine fee" - Former NSW Ministers Hazzard, Tudehope insis
Read more