AUD 750 Million wasted on COVID PPE that was thrown out -Some evidence of an accounting blackhole that the Perrotet government may be trying to conceal with its non-health service related quarantine fees

 by Ganesh Sahathevan



The ABC has reported:

The NSW opposition has accused the state government of wasting more than three quarters of a billion dollars on PPE that had to be thrown out because it did not meet standards.

The discarded equipment included more than $150 million of face masks.

A spokesperson for NSW Health said the faulty equipment was sourced by a "whole of government" procurement group, led by NSW Police.

The above may well be among the accounting blackholes that the Perrotet Government is trying conceal with funds from its quarantine fee charge, which appears to be in fact a penalty.


TO BE READ WITH 


Collection of Damnien Tudehope's non-health service expenses via Sydney Local Health District likely to have required another Dom Perrotet style Transport Asset Holding Entity shell

October 23, 2021

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 


                                                                 Premier Dominic Perrotet, the former Treasurer


As  previously reported on this blog:

On 21 February 2021 the SMH quoting  NSW Minister For Finance and Small Business Damien Tudehope reported; NSW Finance Minister Damien Tudehope said your invoice for hotel quarantine includes a contribution towards security, testing, cleaning, police, health personnel and other expenses.


It has also been reported  here that  Tudehope is relying  on the  Health Services Act (HSA) to recover costs that fall outside the Act.  

Invoices for the costs associated with the  quarantine program are issued by the Sydney Local Health District.That creates accounting problems at the SLHD, and NSW Health (see story below). 

The revelation that the HSA is being relied on to charge and recover the costs of quarantine compounds those problems for SLHD and NSW Health would have issued invoices for costs incurred by other NSW government departments, for instance NSW Police and NSW Department of Justice.

Therefore it is not unlikely that former Treasurer and now Premier Dominic Perottet would have utilised a shell company like his Transport Asset Holding Entity (TAHE) to house quarantine expenses while the accounting, and legal issues described above are resolved.

If so then as with the TAHE those costs might well be hidden and not reflected in NSW budgets. 



TO BE READ WITH  


Is there a NSW Health Quarantine Fee Entity to rival Perrotet's Transport Asset Holding Entity - Did Treasurer (now Premier) Perrotet create another shell company to house NSW Quarantine costs?


October 14, 2021

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 

 

                                   Premier Dominic Perrotet, the former Treasurer

The SMH revealed in June 2021: 

The NSW government has attempted to cover up how it artificially inflated the state’s budgets by tens of billions of dollars after it shifted the rail network’s costs onto a corporation that still hasn’t been able to properly operate six years after it was launched

The corporation, known as the Transport Asset Holding Entity (TAHE), was part of a plan hatched in 2014 to set up a shell corporation to shift billions of dollars of expenses off the state budget and into a new rail body.

NSW Treasury was able to use the corporation, with the approval of the Australian Bureau of Statistics, to inflate the budget to help mask the government slipping into deficit in 2018.


Premier Dominic Perrotet  was Treasurer from 2017 to 2021; he succeeded Gladys Berejiklian, who was Transport Minister from 2011 to 2015, and then Treasurer, before she became Premier, until two weeks ago when she was succeeded by Perrotet.


The accounting of NSW Quarantine Fees seems so murky that the question has to be asked: Is there a NSW Health Quarantine Fee Entity to rival  Perrotet's  Transport Asset Holding Entity and did Treasurer (now Premier) Perrotet create another shell company  to house NSW Quarantine costs?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ben Robert-Smith : How was Justice Anthony Besanko of the Federal Court able to find that the crime of murder has a civil twin, which can be determined on a balance of probabilities

Image
 by Ganesh Sahathevam                                                                                                                  The Hon Justice Anthony Besanko Media reports about the Ben Robert-Smith defamation matter  have at least given the impression, if not asserted,  that Justice Anthony Besanko of the Federal Court found  that Robert-Smith had committed murder. Most if not all reports have been at pains to stress that the finding was based on a balance of probabilities, and not beyond a reasonable doubt, for the matter was a civil and not criminal matter.  However,  reading his summary one can immediately see that Justice Besanko  found not that Roberts-Smith had committed murder but that the " respondents had, (on  a balance of probabilities) established the substantial truth"  that  Roberts-Smith had committed murder.  However, murder is a  crime and a finding of murder in a criminal court (which is the court in which crimes like murder can be determined!) inv
Read more

Who authorised former NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller to say anything about the Berejiklian era quarantine fee and why? Fuller's notice confirms suspicion that NSW Berejiklian government had no basis to impose the quarantine fee, nor quarantine persons who were COVID negative 

Image
 by Ganesh Sahathevan      Premier Gladys Berejiklian with NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller and Brigadier Mick             Garraway Who authorised former  NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller  to say anything about the  Berejiklian era  quarantine fee and why? Fuller's issuance of his  COVID  quarantine notice, and subsequent silence, would seem to confirm suspicions raised on this blog that NSW's Berejiklian government had no basis to impose its quarantine fee. Fuller's conduct also adds to suspicion that the Berejiklian government did not have the authority, even under its COVID emergency powers, to quarantine persons who were COVID negative. International arrivals had to test negative for COVID before boarding their flights to Sydney, and tests had to be administered within 72 hours of departure. Quarantine on arrival of those who exhibited no COVID symptoms was quite likely unnecessary. It did, of course help bolster Gladys Berejiklian's approval ratings. TO BE RE
Read more

Revenue NSW COVID Quarantine Fee payment demand notices suggest that Police Commissioner Mick Fuller breached the law with his demand for quarantine fees

Image
 By Ganesh Sahathevan  Anyone who has received a Revenue NSW Quarantine Fee demand for payment notice  will be familiar with these words that are contained in the notice: What is the quarantine service fee? A mandatory quarantine service fee applies to all travellers arriving in New South Wales (NSW) who are required to quarantine as part of the public health order. Mandatory quarantine is needed to stop the spread. of COVID-19 in NSW The qurantine fee has been charged pursuant to Section 70 of  the NSW Health Act. However, as previously reported, that section does not permit any imposition of mandatory fees.  However, in apparent defiance of Section 70 of the Health Act, Fuller issued a notice   in which he said  that Revenue NSW " will be charging a mandatory quarantine fee". TOE BE READ WITH  Former NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller said in his notice that Revenue NSW " will be charging a mandatory quarantine fee" - Former NSW Ministers Hazzard, Tudehope insis
Read more