Doctors, AMA, its president Dr Omar Korshid have made claims for the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine that BioNTech has not made : False advertising, and grounds for insurance cover exclusion?

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 



A number of doctors, their trade union the Australian Medical Association, and its president Dr Omar Korshid, have taken to main stream and social media to convince the populace to be COVID vaccinated.

They invariably make claims about vaccine efficacy and safety, and it appears make claims that even BioNTech , the producer of the Pfizer vaccine, does not make. Worse, the risk factors listed by BioNTech seem to have been swept aside. In doing so they are not very different from the political classes (see story below).

However, unlike the PM and other politicians AMA members rely on insurance cover to protect themselves from liability. Making claims about  any medication, including COVID vaccines, that even the manufacturer does not make, and concealing risks the manufacturer makes public, are quite likely grounds for insurance cover exclusion. 


TO BE READ WITH 


Monday, August 30, 2021

BioNTech's SEC disclosed risk factors include " limited regulatory experience with mRNA immunotherapies": Despite the warning, governments worldwide have insisted that they have the skills to evaluate, at record speed, the use of the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID vaccine

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 




More from BioNTech's SEC disclosures. Again, from the 2020 Annual Report: 
"...mRNA drug development has substantial clinical development and regulatory risks due to limited regulatory experience with mRNA immunotherapies...".

This writer cannot recall any government authority admitting to the risk of limited experience with mRNA immunotherapies.
Instead governments everywhere have approved and begun supplying the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine to their people, 

The Australian Government, in typical fashion, via its ABC media service, has even launched a media campaign where it asserts that "no corners have been cut" in manufacturing and approving any of the COVID vaccines.

TO BE READ WITH 





Saturday, August 28, 2021

Pfizer/ BioNTech warned investors that the durability of the immune response of its COVID vaccine had " not yet been demonstrated in clinical trials"-US SEC disclosure by BioNTech calls for investigation into Scott Morrison, Daniel Andrews, and Gladys Berekilian's promotion of Pfizer/ BioNTech

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 


Prime Minister Scott Morrison had his Covid jab in February 2021.



The developer of the Pfizer COVID vaccine, Comirnaty,
BioNTech SE has lodged documents at the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), pursuant to US securities disclosure laws.

The documents include BioNTech SE's annual report for the year ended 31 December 2021 It includes this statement which is among a range of cautionary statements that the company is bound by law to alert investors to:

"......the durability of (the) immune response generated by our COVID-19 vaccine....has not yet been demonstrated in clinical trials........."

This is an important issue for investors for a vaccine with limited durability is not going to sell well, if at all.  Taxpayers would not be willing to spend billions on a vaccine that provides protection for only a relatively short  amount of time. 

However, in Australia, we have in fact seen the Prime Minister, Scott Morrison,  and the state leaders in particular  Premier Daniel Andrews of Victoria  and Premier Gladys Berekilian of NSW  promoting  the  Pfizer/ BioNTech COVID vaccine, as if it were guaranteed to provide life long protection. In the process they have expanded billions. Taxpayers are entitled to an explanation.

END 
Posted by at  
Posted by at  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ben Robert-Smith : How was Justice Anthony Besanko of the Federal Court able to find that the crime of murder has a civil twin, which can be determined on a balance of probabilities

Image
 by Ganesh Sahathevam                                                                                                                  The Hon Justice Anthony Besanko Media reports about the Ben Robert-Smith defamation matter  have at least given the impression, if not asserted,  that Justice Anthony Besanko of the Federal Court found  that Robert-Smith had committed murder. Most if not all reports have been at pains to stress that the finding was based on a balance of probabilities, and not beyond a reasonable doubt, for the matter was a civil and not criminal matter.  However,  reading his summary one can immediately see that Justice Besanko  found not that Roberts-Smith had committed murder but that the " respondents had, (on  a balance of probabilities) established the substantial truth"  that  Roberts-Smith had committed murder.  However, murder is a  crime and a finding of murder in a criminal court (which is the court in which crimes like murder can be determined!) inv
Read more

Who authorised former NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller to say anything about the Berejiklian era quarantine fee and why? Fuller's notice confirms suspicion that NSW Berejiklian government had no basis to impose the quarantine fee, nor quarantine persons who were COVID negative 

Image
 by Ganesh Sahathevan      Premier Gladys Berejiklian with NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller and Brigadier Mick             Garraway Who authorised former  NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller  to say anything about the  Berejiklian era  quarantine fee and why? Fuller's issuance of his  COVID  quarantine notice, and subsequent silence, would seem to confirm suspicions raised on this blog that NSW's Berejiklian government had no basis to impose its quarantine fee. Fuller's conduct also adds to suspicion that the Berejiklian government did not have the authority, even under its COVID emergency powers, to quarantine persons who were COVID negative. International arrivals had to test negative for COVID before boarding their flights to Sydney, and tests had to be administered within 72 hours of departure. Quarantine on arrival of those who exhibited no COVID symptoms was quite likely unnecessary. It did, of course help bolster Gladys Berejiklian's approval ratings. TO BE RE
Read more

Revenue NSW COVID Quarantine Fee payment demand notices suggest that Police Commissioner Mick Fuller breached the law with his demand for quarantine fees

Image
 By Ganesh Sahathevan  Anyone who has received a Revenue NSW Quarantine Fee demand for payment notice  will be familiar with these words that are contained in the notice: What is the quarantine service fee? A mandatory quarantine service fee applies to all travellers arriving in New South Wales (NSW) who are required to quarantine as part of the public health order. Mandatory quarantine is needed to stop the spread. of COVID-19 in NSW The qurantine fee has been charged pursuant to Section 70 of  the NSW Health Act. However, as previously reported, that section does not permit any imposition of mandatory fees.  However, in apparent defiance of Section 70 of the Health Act, Fuller issued a notice   in which he said  that Revenue NSW " will be charging a mandatory quarantine fee". TOE BE READ WITH  Former NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller said in his notice that Revenue NSW " will be charging a mandatory quarantine fee" - Former NSW Ministers Hazzard, Tudehope insis
Read more