National Journalism Laureate Dato Rejal Arbee should defend his right to question the legitimacy of the Johor succession as aggressively as he defended the Litrak IPO



by Ganesh Sahathevan 



Readers will find that the story by National Journalism Laureate Dato Rejal Arbee questioning the legitimacy of the present Johor Royal Family [" where (does) the regal prefix ‘Tengku’ or ‘Tunku’ in the names of the Johor royals come from"], has been removed.
This is not becoming of a National Journalism Laureate.


Rejal ought to defend his right to question as aggressively as he defended the Litrak-Gamuda IPO.

To Be Read With 






National Journalism Laureate Dato Rejal Arbee says current Sultan Of Johor,his ancestors and heirs are not "real Johor royals": Evidence not provided for potentially defamatory seditious and treasonous statements



January 08, 2021

 

tokoh 15 (8)            YBhg Datuk Ahmad Rejal Arbee




By his professed standards of journalism, declared under oath in court, this assertion by National Journalism Laureate Dato Rejal Arbee that the current Sultan Of Johor his ancestors and his heirs are not "real Johor royals" lacks evidence. The statements made in this story are potentially defamatory, seditious and treasonous.

Rejal states his thesis strongly and without qualification:

Therefore, there is no denying the fact the current Johor Sultan is a descendant of the Bugis Temenggong, who was commoner and not of the rightful Sultan Ali, a Malay, who was simply sidelined by the British.

This is a fact of history that is undeniable. It proves that the current Johor Sultan is actually a descendant of the treacherous commoner Temenggong who had usurped the reigns of the Sultan.

It will be interesting to see his evidence.




TO BE READ WITH 


Image:Sultan Ali Iskandar Shah ibni Hussein Muazzam Shah
By DATUK REJAL ARBEE

 

There is no denying the fact the current Johor Sultan is a descendant of the Bugis Temenggong, who was commoner and not of the rightful Sultan Ali, a Malay, who was simply sidelined by the British.

 

SO much has been written and discussed about the origins of the present Johor royalty and sultanate over the past few days.

The one fact that stands out is that they are the descendants of the Temenggong, a commoner of Bugis descent, who had usurped the reins of power in Johor from the rightful ruler, Sultan Ali.

He was not recognised by the British, who already had eyes for Johor at that time, thus, their support for the Temenggong and in the process fulfilling their desire of controlling the area.

Therefore, there is no denying the fact the current Johor Sultan is a descendant of the Bugis Temenggong, who was commoner and not of the rightful Sultan Ali, a Malay, who was simply sidelined by the British.

This is a fact of history that is undeniable. It proves that the current Johor Sultan is actually a descendant of the treacherous commoner Temenggong who had usurped the reigns of the Sultan.

Thus, I had previously asked where the regal prefix ‘Tengku’ or ‘Tunku’ in the names of the Johor royals come from?

–BebasNews

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ben Robert-Smith : How was Justice Anthony Besanko of the Federal Court able to find that the crime of murder has a civil twin, which can be determined on a balance of probabilities

Image
 by Ganesh Sahathevam                                                                                                                  The Hon Justice Anthony Besanko Media reports about the Ben Robert-Smith defamation matter  have at least given the impression, if not asserted,  that Justice Anthony Besanko of the Federal Court found  that Robert-Smith had committed murder. Most if not all reports have been at pains to stress that the finding was based on a balance of probabilities, and not beyond a reasonable doubt, for the matter was a civil and not criminal matter.  However,  reading his summary one can immediately see that Justice Besanko  found not that Roberts-Smith had committed murder but that the " respondents had, (on  a balance of probabilities) established the substantial truth"  that  Roberts-Smith had committed murder.  However, murder is a  crime and a finding of murder in a criminal court (which is the court in which crimes like murder can be determined!) inv
Read more

Who authorised former NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller to say anything about the Berejiklian era quarantine fee and why? Fuller's notice confirms suspicion that NSW Berejiklian government had no basis to impose the quarantine fee, nor quarantine persons who were COVID negative 

Image
 by Ganesh Sahathevan      Premier Gladys Berejiklian with NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller and Brigadier Mick             Garraway Who authorised former  NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller  to say anything about the  Berejiklian era  quarantine fee and why? Fuller's issuance of his  COVID  quarantine notice, and subsequent silence, would seem to confirm suspicions raised on this blog that NSW's Berejiklian government had no basis to impose its quarantine fee. Fuller's conduct also adds to suspicion that the Berejiklian government did not have the authority, even under its COVID emergency powers, to quarantine persons who were COVID negative. International arrivals had to test negative for COVID before boarding their flights to Sydney, and tests had to be administered within 72 hours of departure. Quarantine on arrival of those who exhibited no COVID symptoms was quite likely unnecessary. It did, of course help bolster Gladys Berejiklian's approval ratings. TO BE RE
Read more

Revenue NSW COVID Quarantine Fee payment demand notices suggest that Police Commissioner Mick Fuller breached the law with his demand for quarantine fees

Image
 By Ganesh Sahathevan  Anyone who has received a Revenue NSW Quarantine Fee demand for payment notice  will be familiar with these words that are contained in the notice: What is the quarantine service fee? A mandatory quarantine service fee applies to all travellers arriving in New South Wales (NSW) who are required to quarantine as part of the public health order. Mandatory quarantine is needed to stop the spread. of COVID-19 in NSW The qurantine fee has been charged pursuant to Section 70 of  the NSW Health Act. However, as previously reported, that section does not permit any imposition of mandatory fees.  However, in apparent defiance of Section 70 of the Health Act, Fuller issued a notice   in which he said  that Revenue NSW " will be charging a mandatory quarantine fee". TOE BE READ WITH  Former NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller said in his notice that Revenue NSW " will be charging a mandatory quarantine fee" - Former NSW Ministers Hazzard, Tudehope insis
Read more