Covid-19 presents Australian Government with a once in a lifetime opportunity to cut fat : Cutting funding to College Of Law Sydney can save AUD 3 Billion, other areas of waste can be easily identified



by Ganesh Sahathevan

It is obvious that the Government's Covid-19 stimulus will have to be large, and it is equally obvious that funding the stimulus will require an increase in taxes. Meanwhile there is plenty in Government funding that is wasteful and unproductive. That waste must go, and the fat should be incised quickly in order to minimise the burden on the taxpayer.

The New South Wales and Australian legal establishment's College Of Law Sydney is one example and the method outlined below for estimating the quantum of the waste  can be used as a quick and easy way to estimate how much can be saved from other outflows of taxpayer cash in other areas of spending.

The College Of Law Sydney has been shown to cost the taxpayer approximately AUD 50 Million in FEE HELP funding.

That annual outflow is worth in present value terms approximately AUD 3.35  Billion , when discounted at the current 15 Year Government Bond Yield of 1.49%. Cashflows into perpetuity are often approximated over a period of 30 years, and hence the use of the 15 year rate. The other rates listed by Bloomberg can be used as substitutes, depending of the nature of the spending.

Government Bond Yields

NAMECOUPONPRICEYIELD1 DAY1 MONTH1 YEARTIME (EDT)
GTAUD2Y:GOV
Australia Bond 2 Year Yield
2.00103.000.25%-4-40-1263/20/2020
GTAUD5Y:GOV

Australia Bond 5 Year Yield
2.75109.590.35%0-29-1153/20/2020
GTAUD10Y:GOV
Australia Bond 10 Year Yield
2.50112.991.11%-30+20-743/20/2020
GTAUD15Y:GOV
Australia Bond 15 Year Yield
2.75115.791.49%-26+44-593/20/2020

Reserve Bank of Australia Rates

RATECURRENT1 YEAR PRIOR

RBATCTR:IND

RBA Cash Rate Target
0.251.50






































Other areas of spending will be identified in the coming weeks.
END



SEE ALSO

Frustration grows over unis ‘cashing in’ on law grad oversupply

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ben Robert-Smith : How was Justice Anthony Besanko of the Federal Court able to find that the crime of murder has a civil twin, which can be determined on a balance of probabilities

Image
 by Ganesh Sahathevam                                                                                                                  The Hon Justice Anthony Besanko Media reports about the Ben Robert-Smith defamation matter  have at least given the impression, if not asserted,  that Justice Anthony Besanko of the Federal Court found  that Robert-Smith had committed murder. Most if not all reports have been at pains to stress that the finding was based on a balance of probabilities, and not beyond a reasonable doubt, for the matter was a civil and not criminal matter.  However,  reading his summary one can immediately see that Justice Besanko  found not that Roberts-Smith had committed murder but that the " respondents had, (on  a balance of probabilities) established the substantial truth"  that  Roberts-Smith had committed murder.  However, murder is a  crime and a finding of murder in a criminal court (which is the court in which crimes like murder can be determined!) inv
Read more

Who authorised former NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller to say anything about the Berejiklian era quarantine fee and why? Fuller's notice confirms suspicion that NSW Berejiklian government had no basis to impose the quarantine fee, nor quarantine persons who were COVID negative 

Image
 by Ganesh Sahathevan      Premier Gladys Berejiklian with NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller and Brigadier Mick             Garraway Who authorised former  NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller  to say anything about the  Berejiklian era  quarantine fee and why? Fuller's issuance of his  COVID  quarantine notice, and subsequent silence, would seem to confirm suspicions raised on this blog that NSW's Berejiklian government had no basis to impose its quarantine fee. Fuller's conduct also adds to suspicion that the Berejiklian government did not have the authority, even under its COVID emergency powers, to quarantine persons who were COVID negative. International arrivals had to test negative for COVID before boarding their flights to Sydney, and tests had to be administered within 72 hours of departure. Quarantine on arrival of those who exhibited no COVID symptoms was quite likely unnecessary. It did, of course help bolster Gladys Berejiklian's approval ratings. TO BE RE
Read more

Revenue NSW COVID Quarantine Fee payment demand notices suggest that Police Commissioner Mick Fuller breached the law with his demand for quarantine fees

Image
 By Ganesh Sahathevan  Anyone who has received a Revenue NSW Quarantine Fee demand for payment notice  will be familiar with these words that are contained in the notice: What is the quarantine service fee? A mandatory quarantine service fee applies to all travellers arriving in New South Wales (NSW) who are required to quarantine as part of the public health order. Mandatory quarantine is needed to stop the spread. of COVID-19 in NSW The qurantine fee has been charged pursuant to Section 70 of  the NSW Health Act. However, as previously reported, that section does not permit any imposition of mandatory fees.  However, in apparent defiance of Section 70 of the Health Act, Fuller issued a notice   in which he said  that Revenue NSW " will be charging a mandatory quarantine fee". TOE BE READ WITH  Former NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller said in his notice that Revenue NSW " will be charging a mandatory quarantine fee" - Former NSW Ministers Hazzard, Tudehope insis
Read more