Premier-in-waiting Mark Speakman proves, as predicted, that he cannot defend us from terrorism-Seems preoccupied these days with domestic violence issues
Get link
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
by Ganesh Sahathevan
As mentioned before, the Department Of Justice has no business in trying to burnish its Minister's image, or protect him from criticism. As this writer has noted before, the Attorney General NSW , and premier-in-waiting, Mark Speakman, does not appear to have what it takes to keep us safe from terrorism; he has had trouble enough trying to manage far simpler issues like the administration of the Oaths Act 1900. Readers are reminded that Speakman allowed his department to unlawfully exclude ministers of religion as even witnesses of statutory declarations, and even when alerted to the fact refused to rectify the matter.
While this writer was than concerned with operational counter-terrorism issues, it now appears that Speakman who is considered a future premier of NSW and has had many years experience as a barrister, is not even able to ensure that the relevant legislation is up-to-date.
While previously pre-occupied with interfering in religious freedom, the AG seems these days pre-occupied with domestic violence, constantly tweeting on the subject.He has had little if anything to say about terrorism in the past year.
The Berejiklian government has had to rush a terror law into parliament after it discovered it had allowed a terrorist offence to lapse under a sunset clause contained in earlier terror legislation.
Attorney-General Mark Speakman claimed in the Legislative Assembly on Tuesday that the lapse, while it should not have occurred, was not too alarming because the offence was already covered by federal legislation.
But Labor’s upper house leader Adam Searle said the government could not have it both ways and claim that the lapse did not matter and rush the bill into the parliament.
On Tuesday, Mr Speakman told parliament: “Yesterday the Department of Communities and Justice advised me that part 6B of the Crimes Act 1900 had been automatically repealed after a sunset clause took effect. Part 6B contains the New South Wales offence of membership of a terrorist organisation.
“Given the identical Commonwealth offence in section 102.3 of the Criminal Code, the automatic repeal of part 6B has no operational impact and poses no risk to community safety. The counter-terrorism minister, and member for Lane Cove, and I have directed the secretary of the department to ensure that in future robust procedures in place for reviewing forthcoming timed repeal of regulations also apply to timed repeal of statutes.
“Out of abundance of caution the government is moving an amendment to the Justice Legislation Amendment Bill … The sunset clause in section 310L is not proposed to be reinstated so that the New South Wales offence of membership of a terrorist organisation will be permanently retained. I commend the amendments to the House.”
The Shadow Attorney-General Paul Lynch retorted: “The Opposition does not oppose the amendments but I have to say this is utterly extraordinary. There is a sunset clause and someone forgets to renew the thing before the sunset clause comes into effect. The government keeps telling us how seriously it takes the threat of terrorism. It is one of the greatest threats to our society, yet this government cannot keep the offences against it on the statute book. It is utterly extraordinary.”
by Ganesh Sahathevam The Hon Justice Anthony Besanko Media reports about the Ben Robert-Smith defamation matter have at least given the impression, if not asserted, that Justice Anthony Besanko of the Federal Court found that Robert-Smith had committed murder. Most if not all reports have been at pains to stress that the finding was based on a balance of probabilities, and not beyond a reasonable doubt, for the matter was a civil and not criminal matter. However, reading his summary one can immediately see that Justice Besanko found not that Roberts-Smith had committed murder but that the " respondents had, (on a balance of probabilities) established the substantial truth" that Roberts-Smith had committed murder. However, murder is a crime and a finding of murder in a criminal court (which is the court in which crimes like murder can be determined!) inv
by Ganesh Sahathevan Premier Gladys Berejiklian with NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller and Brigadier Mick Garraway Who authorised former NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller to say anything about the Berejiklian era quarantine fee and why? Fuller's issuance of his COVID quarantine notice, and subsequent silence, would seem to confirm suspicions raised on this blog that NSW's Berejiklian government had no basis to impose its quarantine fee. Fuller's conduct also adds to suspicion that the Berejiklian government did not have the authority, even under its COVID emergency powers, to quarantine persons who were COVID negative. International arrivals had to test negative for COVID before boarding their flights to Sydney, and tests had to be administered within 72 hours of departure. Quarantine on arrival of those who exhibited no COVID symptoms was quite likely unnecessary. It did, of course help bolster Gladys Berejiklian's approval ratings. TO BE RE
By Ganesh Sahathevan Anyone who has received a Revenue NSW Quarantine Fee demand for payment notice will be familiar with these words that are contained in the notice: What is the quarantine service fee? A mandatory quarantine service fee applies to all travellers arriving in New South Wales (NSW) who are required to quarantine as part of the public health order. Mandatory quarantine is needed to stop the spread. of COVID-19 in NSW The qurantine fee has been charged pursuant to Section 70 of the NSW Health Act. However, as previously reported, that section does not permit any imposition of mandatory fees. However, in apparent defiance of Section 70 of the Health Act, Fuller issued a notice in which he said that Revenue NSW " will be charging a mandatory quarantine fee". TOE BE READ WITH Former NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller said in his notice that Revenue NSW " will be charging a mandatory quarantine fee" - Former NSW Ministers Hazzard, Tudehope insis
‘Extraordinary’ NSW terror law lapse
Comments
Post a Comment