The Melbourne CBD is even more vulnerable than Mumbai and Paris to jihadi swarming attacks

by Ganesh Sahathevan


In a 2015 article this writer described how  swarming attacks  like those seen in Mumbai and Paris could easily happen in Australia, and why the armed forces are best placed  to deal with that threat.
 Consequently and as a result of a recent excursion trough the streets and alleyways of Melbourne this writer has come to realize that  the Melbourne CBD provides an especially suited  environment for such an attack.

To begin with , the CBD  (see picture below)  is neatly divided into  square grids which makes identifying and planning insertion , execution,  extraction and recovery  zones easy, or at least easier compared to say Mumbai.Then,the squares are inter-connected in many different ways, which enables the use of different modes of transport.One could easily imagine a combination of trucks and scrambler motorbikes being used for the insertion  of attackers who could then proceed on foot,very easily picking off targets without hindrance given the density of people in the lanes,which in some places extend into the shopping and entertainment precincts





Surrounding the grid are the main roads which have convenient entry and exit points that can be blocked-of with quite easily, thus entrapping all those in the grid, and keeping assistance out.
Open spaces for aerial insertion of troops and medics are few and easily identifiable, and readily booby trapped.

 As this writer discovered, doing the ground work for such an attack is quite easy.Melbourne police are so obliging that one could walk the streets for days taking notes and pictures without being bothered in any way, even when dressed in black track suit ,sneakers and carrying a military issue side bag.
END

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sydney is not Soweto, its Asian migrants are not coloureds, or persons of colour - South African Australian Judge Angus Morkel Stewart's decision in Faruqi v Hanson an insult to anyone who is not white

Image
 by Ganesh Sahathevan  In the recent Federal Court Australia decision in   Faruqi v Hanson   Mr Justice Angus Morkel Stewart (Stewart J)  found at [242]: I am comfortably satisfied that both groups of people in Australia that I have identified, being persons of colour who are migrants or of relatively recent migrant heritage and persons of colour who are Muslim, are reasonably likely, in all the circumstances, to have been offended (ie profoundly and seriously), insulted, humiliated and intimidated by Senator (Pauline ) Hanson’s tweet. The case concerned   a tweet  that One Nation leader Pauline Hanson directed at  Deputy Greens leader Senator  Mehreen Faruqi. Mehreen is Pakistani Muslim who continues to advocate for Pakistan as a senator of the Senate, Parliament Of Australia.  Senator Hanson wrote in her tweet "piss off back to Pakistan" after Senator Faruqi commented on the death of Queen Elizabeth II. While Stewart J's has hand...
Read more

Ex NSW LPAB Executive Officer Louise Pritchard ,subject of queries from The Australian, hired by Sydney University since early 2019 -NSW LPAB has never explained her departure, UYSD the reasons for her appointment

Image
  by Ganesh Sahathevan  In January 2019 The Australian reported:  The body overseen by Chief Justice Tom Bathurst responsible for deciding who can practise law in NSW relied on a wildly defamatory Malaysian blog depicting ABC journalists, former British prime minister Tony Blair, financier George Soros and others as part of a global conspiracy when deciding to deny a would-be solicitor a certificate to practise. Chief Justice Bathurst and Legal Practitioner Admission Board executive officer Louise Pritchard declined to answer The Australian’s questions about how the article came into the board’s hands and why its members felt the conspiracy-laden material could be relied upon as part of a decision to deny Sydney man Ganesh Sahathevan admission as a lawyer. Nor would either say which of the 10 members of the LPAB, three of whom are serving NSW Supreme Court judges, was on the deciding panel. Ms Pritchard has left her role at the LPAB since The Australian began making inqui...
Read more

Strata managers' aversion to contact with tenants can leave strata managers exposed to personal liability

Image
 by Ganesh Sahathevan      Advice for living in, or buying into, a strata community Strata managers are employed to manage strata schemes which are often home to renters as well as owners. However, in evasion of that which they are paid to do there are instances where strata managers have attempted  to evade their duties by refusing to  deal with tenants.   Even this writer can recall an instance where the strata manager warned that it was against the law for tenants to contact him directly.  The instances where strata managers have refused to deal with tenants occur when the issues raised concern fairly pedestrian maintenance issues, for example blocked plumbing and the like. Having said that, tenants do actually have a legal right to a great many things, including being informed (and presumably make representations) when strata schemes consider re-development. Strata managers who seek to stand in place of strata committees  are even more e...
Read more