Riza, Jho Low will have to " show cause why forfeiture should not be decreed"-Najib & co have snowball's hope in hell that US courts will accept "donation " and other fairy tales
by Ganesh Sahathevan
These statements at the end of the indictment seem to have been (purposefully?) ignored by Malaysian PM Najib, AG Very Learned Apandi, and a whole slew of others who may well be deemed co-conspirators in the 1 MDB theft:
WHEREFORE, plaintiff United States of America prays that:
These statements at the end of the indictment seem to have been (purposefully?) ignored by Malaysian PM Najib, AG Very Learned Apandi, and a whole slew of others who may well be deemed co-conspirators in the 1 MDB theft:
WHEREFORE, plaintiff United States of America prays that:
(a) due process issue to enforce the forfeiture of the Defendant Asset;
(b) due notice be given to all interested parties to appear and show cause why forfeiture should not be decreed;
(c) this Court decree forfeiture of the Defendant Asset to the United States of America for disposition according to law; and
(d) for such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper, together with the costs and disbursements of this action.
In layman's terms, Riza Aziz and others interested in the Defendant Asset ie the "Wolf of Wall Street" , must, if they so wish, come to court and explain why the forfeiture should not be granted ie that their source of funds is legitimate. It iis not expected that any US court or judge is going to prefer the Najib "donation" story , or the RIza Aziz "gift" story , to the evidence of the DOJ.The indictment makes clear that these stories have been considered,and found less than convincing.
END
Comments
Post a Comment