Agong's hands will be tied--Keruak' s breach of convention suggests sedition, and in any case , the Agong's hands can never be tied....

by Ganesh Sahthevan 

Regardless of  how one might interpret the Federal Constitution, its underlying basis is that of a monarch  or supreme ruler, the Agong. Consequently the wording of the Constitution is careful to never even imply, let alone express, that the Agong's powers are in any way limited, even if it provides for him to act under the advice of his government. 

Convention provides that the Agong only act as advised, but similarly convention also requires that the powers  of the Agong, be never challenged. There is good reason for this,for the Agong and his fellow rulers have untested reserve powers which again, by convention, are never tested. Put in another way, convention provides that the rulers should not be put to the test. 

Convention is a strange creature and dependent on the norms and practices of  the ruler and his people. Given the context of the Malay-Muslim culture from which the Agong and his brother rulers draw their powers, it would be very unwise for anyone to try and determine the limits of those powers. Consequently, and given Malaysia;s  laws against sedition ,  it is extremely unwise to declare that the  rulers hands are in anyway "tied".

Communications and Multimedia Minister Salleh Said Keruak has chosen to do so, and he is probably in breach of the laws against sedition. 

END 

See also










Minister: Agong's hands tied on Citizens' Declaration petition

 29 comments     Published 13 May 2016, 10:59 pm     Updated 13 May 2016, 11:03 pm
  


The Citizens' Declaration, which is to be submitted to the Yang Di-Pertuan Agong, may have gathered a million signatures but there is little that the monarch can do about it, says Communications and Multimedia Minister Salleh Said Keruak.

The declaration, initiated by the Save Malaysia movement, calls for the removal of Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak.

However, Salleh said there is no legal provision for the Agong to do this.

"While in a democracy that (petition) is allowed, however, according to the law or the Federal Constitution of Malaysia, there is very little His Majesty can do about this petition.

"There is no provision in the constitution that allows the Agong to sack a prime minister.

"The prime minister’s own party has to do that (like in the case of then Selangor menteri besar Khalid Ibrahim) or MPs from the prime minister’s own party have to cross over to the opposition (like in the case of Perak Menteri Besar Nizar Jamaluddin)," Salleh said in a blog posting today.

'Gov't often told to respect constitution'

He said while the government is often told to respect and observe the constitution, those who oppose the government must also walk the same talk.


"The constitution very specifically says that the member of the House who commands the confidence of the majority of the members of the House gets to become prime minister.



"In that same spirit, if the prime minister loses the confidence of the majority members of the House then he has to step down as prime minister.

"This means not just the prime minister but (if) the party that the prime minister leads is ousted and the party from the other side gets to form the new government," he said.

Among the ways to achieve this is through a vote of no-confidence against the prime minister or for members of the ruling coalition to cross over to the opposition.

"Other than that, His Majesty’s hands will be tied," Salleh added.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

AG NSW Mark Speakman, two Sydney University appointments by former USYD General Counsel Richard Fisher, the NSW LPAB, and Sydney Water- Speakman has even more election funding questions to answer as he defends his NSW seat of Cronulla

Sydney is not Soweto, its Asian migrants are not coloureds, or persons of colour - South African Australian Judge Angus Morkel Stewart's decision in Faruqi v Hanson an insult to anyone who is not white

Government funding for the College Of Law PLT where students are assessed on the quality of their reflection on their work experience , not the quality of their work experience