Sarawak Report says Villawood detainee coerced into making taped statement while in custody: Dutton, SERCO ,accused of running Villawood like a Thai prison


by Ganesh Sahthevan


The following statements have just been published on the Sarawak Report investigative news site.
The allegation is clear; that Villawood detainee Sirul Azhar is being coerced into making recorded
statements which are clearly detrimental to his own case but obviously useful to Malaysian
Prime Minister Najib Razak, just like Swiss national Xavier Justo who is being held in a prison in Thailand.
These recordings could not have been made without the express permission on the SERCO who manage
Villawood, and the Minister for Immigration Peter Dutton.


For background and context see

Latest Sirul Azhar "Expose from Villawood" suggests Dutton, SERCO ,Turnbull complicit in Sirul's works;raises questions about payments to a person while in detention
END 

13 FEB 2016

11

Sirul, You Said It - So How Come It's A Lie?

13 FEB 2016

Sirul, You Said It - So How Come It's A Lie?

13 FEB 2016


Sirul and Justo - Jailbirds Who Are Forced To Sing



Former police commando Sirul Azhar Umar has allegedly revealed the names of those who
purportedly attempted to bribe or coax him into implicating Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak
in the murder of Mongolian national Altantuya Shaariibuu, according to a source.
The source, who is in possession of Sirul’s alleged video confession, told Malaysiakini that five
names were mentioned.
Though he declined to reveal the identities for now, the source, who met Sirul at the
Villawood immigration detention centre in Australia, said those mentioned include both Umno and
opposition leaders.
“I cannot tell you who they are (for now) but some big names have been mentioned.
“Some of them had (allegedly) approached him directly while others through their aides or
 representatives.
“The video will be released soon,” he added.
Previously, three parts of Sirul’s video confession were released, where the former corporal
 claimed that there were attempts to use him to engineer the downfall of someone.
Though he did not state who this person was, it was an obvious reference to the prime minister.


Source: Sirul and Justo - Jailbirds Who Are Forced To Sing, Malaysiakini


Our comment




Sarawak Report’s Editor fully expects to be ‘named’ by Sirul, along with others 

who have sought the truth in these matters. It follows a pattern of attempts to 

discredit this blog, using discredited people.


Viewers will be at liberty to wonder why this killer, who is trapped in jail, has 

changed his tune from his original complaint at his trial that he had been made a 

scapegoat by powerful people; to his hints last year that he mightspeak out about 

who ordered him to kill Altantuya and now finally to this series of filmed 

statements, which betray just one motive – to “clear” Najib of any involvement 

in the murder of the woman, who was seeking to blackmail him.


SR, along with many other journalists, attempted to visit Sirul in jail to hear his 

story last year. However, his lawyers (whom we have proved are UMNO insiders) 

banned all further visits, except from them. This video is therefore orchestrated 

by Sirul’s UMNO lawyers, who are the only visitors allowed.



It contrasts with the messages found on Sirul’s own mobile phone after his arrest, 

which were later obtained by Al Jazeera. These detail how before Sirul was 

picked up in Australia he was demanding millions of dollars from his UMNO 

contracts to “say nothing”.


“This way I won’t bring down the PM” said Sirul in these private messages.


Najib threatened to sue Al Jazeera for their expose and then did not.


Has Sirul been paid and promised his pardon in return for cooperating in this

 alternative strategy?



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sydney is not Soweto, its Asian migrants are not coloureds, or persons of colour - South African Australian Judge Angus Morkel Stewart's decision in Faruqi v Hanson an insult to anyone who is not white

Image
 by Ganesh Sahathevan  In the recent Federal Court Australia decision in   Faruqi v Hanson   Mr Justice Angus Morkel Stewart (Stewart J)  found at [242]: I am comfortably satisfied that both groups of people in Australia that I have identified, being persons of colour who are migrants or of relatively recent migrant heritage and persons of colour who are Muslim, are reasonably likely, in all the circumstances, to have been offended (ie profoundly and seriously), insulted, humiliated and intimidated by Senator (Pauline ) Hanson’s tweet. The case concerned   a tweet  that One Nation leader Pauline Hanson directed at  Deputy Greens leader Senator  Mehreen Faruqi. Mehreen is Pakistani Muslim who continues to advocate for Pakistan as a senator of the Senate, Parliament Of Australia.  Senator Hanson wrote in her tweet "piss off back to Pakistan" after Senator Faruqi commented on the death of Queen Elizabeth II. While Stewart J's has hand...
Read more

Ex NSW LPAB Executive Officer Louise Pritchard ,subject of queries from The Australian, hired by Sydney University since early 2019 -NSW LPAB has never explained her departure, UYSD the reasons for her appointment

Image
  by Ganesh Sahathevan  In January 2019 The Australian reported:  The body overseen by Chief Justice Tom Bathurst responsible for deciding who can practise law in NSW relied on a wildly defamatory Malaysian blog depicting ABC journalists, former British prime minister Tony Blair, financier George Soros and others as part of a global conspiracy when deciding to deny a would-be solicitor a certificate to practise. Chief Justice Bathurst and Legal Practitioner Admission Board executive officer Louise Pritchard declined to answer The Australian’s questions about how the article came into the board’s hands and why its members felt the conspiracy-laden material could be relied upon as part of a decision to deny Sydney man Ganesh Sahathevan admission as a lawyer. Nor would either say which of the 10 members of the LPAB, three of whom are serving NSW Supreme Court judges, was on the deciding panel. Ms Pritchard has left her role at the LPAB since The Australian began making inqui...
Read more

Strata managers' aversion to contact with tenants can leave strata managers exposed to personal liability

Image
 by Ganesh Sahathevan      Advice for living in, or buying into, a strata community Strata managers are employed to manage strata schemes which are often home to renters as well as owners. However, in evasion of that which they are paid to do there are instances where strata managers have attempted  to evade their duties by refusing to  deal with tenants.   Even this writer can recall an instance where the strata manager warned that it was against the law for tenants to contact him directly.  The instances where strata managers have refused to deal with tenants occur when the issues raised concern fairly pedestrian maintenance issues, for example blocked plumbing and the like. Having said that, tenants do actually have a legal right to a great many things, including being informed (and presumably make representations) when strata schemes consider re-development. Strata managers who seek to stand in place of strata committees  are even more e...
Read more