IPIC says Najib & 1 MDB owe $481 million-IPIC may have grounds to sue Najib personally for what he says is an amount that could be anything...

by Ganesh Sahathevan

It has been previously reported on this blog that  Prime Minister and Minister For Finance Najib Razak denied in Parliament that  1 MDB owed the International Petroleum Investment Corporation (IPIC) US$ 481 million. Najib was quoted saying:

“Notes in the 1MDB financial report ended March 31, 2014, clearly state that no such amount  was borne by 1MDB from IPIC,” said Najib, who is also the prime minister.


IPIC on the other hand seem to have a very different view of things, and have said so in its Annual Report for the year ended 31 December 2014, issued sometime in June this year:

In 2014, the Group entered into an agreement relating to the Options Agreements where the Group assigned all of its rights under the Options Agreement to 1MDB and its subsidiaries for a fixed price. As of 31 December 2014, an amount of US $ 481,326 thousand was outstanding.

As mentioned, the annual report was issued sometime in June.If at all the debt or any part of it  had been repaid, it would have been mentioned in the notes.It has not.

The issue of Najib's personal liability arises in part  as a result of  IPIC assuming 1 MDB's liabilities pursuant to the two USD 1.75 billion bond issues, and assuming responsibility for debt owed  a consortium led by Deutsche Bank. As the notes below, extracted from the IPIC 2014 annual report show, IPIC considers the issue of the guarantee  part and parcel of greater whole, ie of amounts owed it by 1 MDB. For Najib personally the ominous parts are these: 

On 28 May 2015, IPIC, Aabar, Minister of Finance, Inc., Malaysia (MOF) and 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) entered into a binding term sheet that provides for the following principal matters... 
1MDB and MOF have agreed to perform the obligations contemplated in the binding term sheet and to indemnify IPIC and Aabar for any non-performance, and vice versa. IPIC has met the Cash Payment and will meet the interim interest payments under the Notes from existing liquidity available to IPIC.

In other words, IPIC considers that it has done its part .Having done so it to expects the  Minister of Finance, Inc., Malaysia (MOF) to honour its obligations. The MOF Inc is Najib, and while he may think he is protected by the corporate shield, his denial of the debt in parliament does raise the issue of fraud, which makes the shield useless.Then there is the issue of MOF Inc being only Najib, and that too may provide grounds for the shield to be ignored.
The amount owed, as Najib himself seems to suggest, could be anything,and probably a number so large that one could contemplate buying Louis Vuitton many times over, and not just a few Birkin handbags.
As for sovereign immunity..............let us not waste time.
END 



41 1MDB GUARANTEE

The Company agreed in 2012 to guarantee the obligations (principal and associated interests) of certain subsidiaries of 1Malaysia Development Berhad (“1MDB’’), a strategic development company wholly-owned by the Government of Malaysia, in respect of two financings in the energy and power sector. The principal amount of these obligations is US $ 3.5 billion.

The guarantees were initially recognised as a liability at fair value, adjusted for transaction costs that are directly attributable to the issuance of the guarantees. Subsequent to initial recognition, the liability is measured at the higher of the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation at the reporting date and the amount initially recognised less cumulative amortisation. As at 31 December 2014, the unamortised deferred income was US $ 279,751 thousand (31 December 2013: US $ 311,721 thousand) (note 33).

In respect of these financings, the Company benefits from back-to-back guarantees and support from 1MDB and has secured for its Group the rights (“the Options Agreements”) to acquire up to 49% stake in the shares of two subsidiaries of 1MDB at a fixed price.

In 2014, the Group entered into an agreement relating to the Options Agreements where the Group assigned all of its rights under the Options Agreement to 1MDB and its subsidiaries for a fixed price. As of 31 December 2014, an amount of US $ 481,326 thousand was outstanding (note 23).
On 28 May 2015, IPIC, Aabar, Minister of Finance, Inc., Malaysia (MOF) and 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) entered into a binding term sheet that provides for the following principal matters: · on 4 June 2015, IPIC provided US$1 billion to 1MDB for 1MDB to utilise immediately to settle certain of its liabilities (the Cash Payment); · from 4 June 2015, IPIC has assumed the obligations to pay (on an interim basis) all interest due under two
IPIC guaranteed 1MDB financings amounting to US$3.5 billion in aggregate principal amount (the Notes); · upon the completion of the transfer of assets as described below, IPIC will directly assume liability for all payment obligations under the Notes (the Assumption of Debt) and forgive certain financial obligations of the 1MDB Group to the IPIC Group (the Debt Forgiveness); and
· by 30 June 2016, IPIC is to have received a transfer of assets with an aggregate value of an amount which represents the sum of the Cash Payment, the Assumption of Debt and the Debt Forgiveness.
1MDB and MOF have agreed to perform the obligations contemplated in the binding term sheet and to indemnify IPIC and Aabar for any non-performance, and vice versa. IPIC has met the Cash Payment and will meet the interim interest payments under the Notes from existing liquidity
available to IPIC.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ben Robert-Smith : How was Justice Anthony Besanko of the Federal Court able to find that the crime of murder has a civil twin, which can be determined on a balance of probabilities

Who authorised former NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller to say anything about the Berejiklian era quarantine fee and why? Fuller's notice confirms suspicion that NSW Berejiklian government had no basis to impose the quarantine fee, nor quarantine persons who were COVID negative 

Revenue NSW COVID Quarantine Fee payment demand notices suggest that Police Commissioner Mick Fuller breached the law with his demand for quarantine fees