Public Bank's CEO designate demonstrates how when skin matters, the pool is indeed limited-Part 2

The decision to appoint Quah Poh Keat as CEO should not be approved of by Bank Negara which has responsibility to depositors whose funds are the obvious, predominant source of  Public Bank's financing.
To begin with Quah has had no experience running a bank. His only qualification seems to be the fact that he is Chinese, and was the managing partner at Public Bank's auditor KPMG.
This alone should count against him, but the fact of his prior duties at KPMG raises questions about potential conflicts of interest. Indeed the conflict arose in 2008 when Quah was appointed a non-executive director and KPMG remained auditor.
Then , come questions concerning past audits. While Public Bank has been awarded a number of awards for best annual report and so on in Malaysia by the Malaysian audit and accounting fraternity, the fact is the Big 4 in Malaysia have been known and proven to be rather slack in their work.For example,as  one study found :

Audit quality can be defined as relating to the probability that financial statements contain no material omissions or misstatements.  The results of this study are alarming, finding systemic failure on the part of Big 4 auditors in Malaysia to comply with even the most basic elements of the FRS 136 disclosure framework in relation to goodwill impairment testing.


Indeed, Teh Hong Piow himself had difficulty explaining how this loss was accounted for, claiming that no one lost:








BERJAYA INDUSTRIAL DERIVATIVES CASE SETTLED OUT OF COURT.
By Ho Kay Tat.
313 words
14 October 1995
STBT
English
(c) 1995 Singapore Press Holdings Limited
ALL the parties involved in two separate legal suits filed over a US$14 million (S$20 million) derivatives trading loss suffered by Malaysia's Berjaya Industrial have settled the matter out of court, it was announced yesterday. Also embroiled in the dispute were Public Bank subsidiary Public Bank (Labuan), Credit Suisse Financial Products, CS First Boston (Singapore) and CS First Boston (Hongkong).
The other two parties in the settlement were Berjaya Corp (Cayman) and Yong Teck Ming, the former executive director of Berjaya Industrial who resigned for allegedly getting the company involved in the ill-fated derivatives deal without proper clearance.
The parties recognised that it was in their interest to avoid protracted litigation, Berjaya Industrial and Public Bank said in separate but similar statements.
All parties have, therefore, reached a mutually acceptable full and final settlement. All legal proceedings in the English and Malaysian courts have been withdrawn, they said.
The dispute began last December when Berjaya Industrial said it had suffered a loss of US$14 million from several interest-rate swap transactions entered into by its subsidiary Berjaya Corp (Cayman).
The shock disclosure prompted Bank Negara to issue guidelines to ensure that local banks traded prudently in derivatives.
In January, Public Bank (Labuan), which was the intermediary in the transactions, filed a suit in a London court against the two Berjaya units and Credit Suisse Financial Products for, among other things, breach of contract.
Berjaya Industrial and Berjaya Corp (Cayman) responded by starting legal proceedings in the Malaysian High Court on March 1 against Public Bank (Labuan), CS First Boston (Singapore), CS First Boston (Hongkong) and Credit Suisse, seeking damages of M$500 million (S$280 million).
Berjaya Industrial claimed the various transactions were not authorised by its directors and accused the defendants of negligence and misrepresentation.
Document stbt000020011104drae00259

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ben Robert-Smith : How was Justice Anthony Besanko of the Federal Court able to find that the crime of murder has a civil twin, which can be determined on a balance of probabilities

Image
 by Ganesh Sahathevam                                                                                                                  The Hon Justice Anthony Besanko Media reports about the Ben Robert-Smith defamation matter  have at least given the impression, if not asserted,  that Justice Anthony Besanko of the Federal Court found  that Robert-Smith had committed murder. Most if not all reports have been at pains to stress that the finding was based on a balance of probabilities, and not beyond a reasonable doubt, for the matter was a civil and not criminal matter.  However,  reading his summary one can immediately see that Justice Besanko  found not that Roberts-Smith had committed murder but that the " respondents had, (on  a balance of probabilities) established the substantial truth"  that  Roberts-Smith had committed murder.  However, murder is a  crime and a finding of murder in a criminal court (which is the court in which crimes like murder can be determined!) inv
Read more

Who authorised former NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller to say anything about the Berejiklian era quarantine fee and why? Fuller's notice confirms suspicion that NSW Berejiklian government had no basis to impose the quarantine fee, nor quarantine persons who were COVID negative 

Image
 by Ganesh Sahathevan      Premier Gladys Berejiklian with NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller and Brigadier Mick             Garraway Who authorised former  NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller  to say anything about the  Berejiklian era  quarantine fee and why? Fuller's issuance of his  COVID  quarantine notice, and subsequent silence, would seem to confirm suspicions raised on this blog that NSW's Berejiklian government had no basis to impose its quarantine fee. Fuller's conduct also adds to suspicion that the Berejiklian government did not have the authority, even under its COVID emergency powers, to quarantine persons who were COVID negative. International arrivals had to test negative for COVID before boarding their flights to Sydney, and tests had to be administered within 72 hours of departure. Quarantine on arrival of those who exhibited no COVID symptoms was quite likely unnecessary. It did, of course help bolster Gladys Berejiklian's approval ratings. TO BE RE
Read more

Revenue NSW COVID Quarantine Fee payment demand notices suggest that Police Commissioner Mick Fuller breached the law with his demand for quarantine fees

Image
 By Ganesh Sahathevan  Anyone who has received a Revenue NSW Quarantine Fee demand for payment notice  will be familiar with these words that are contained in the notice: What is the quarantine service fee? A mandatory quarantine service fee applies to all travellers arriving in New South Wales (NSW) who are required to quarantine as part of the public health order. Mandatory quarantine is needed to stop the spread. of COVID-19 in NSW The qurantine fee has been charged pursuant to Section 70 of  the NSW Health Act. However, as previously reported, that section does not permit any imposition of mandatory fees.  However, in apparent defiance of Section 70 of the Health Act, Fuller issued a notice   in which he said  that Revenue NSW " will be charging a mandatory quarantine fee". TOE BE READ WITH  Former NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller said in his notice that Revenue NSW " will be charging a mandatory quarantine fee" - Former NSW Ministers Hazzard, Tudehope insis
Read more